2 edition of Threat of sabotage and terrorism to commercial nuclear powerplants found in the catalog.
Threat of sabotage and terrorism to commercial nuclear powerplants
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on General Oversight and Investigations.
by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office, U.S. G.P.O. in Washington
Written in English
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||iv, 262 p. :|
|Number of Pages||262|
The threat of nuclear terrorism most often brings images of a city totally flattened and incinerated by a nuclear bomb. While many focus on the problems associated with stolen weapons-grade nuclear materials, particularly those originating from the former Soviet Union, the greater threat may actually be an attack against a nuclear power plant. This is not some Hollywood fantasy. This is real. A nuclear terrorist event may be closer than you think, writes Joe Cirincione.
The threat of nuclear terrorism has become a global concern. Many countries continue to make efforts to strengthen nuclear security by enhancing systems of nuclear material protection, control. Table of Contents. 1. Introduction, Brecht Volders and Tom Sauer 2. The nuclear threat: a two-level analytical framework to assess the likelihood of nuclear terrorism, Brecht Volders 3. Internal dynamics of a terrorist entity acquiring biological and chemical weapons, Jean Pascal Zanders PART I: Preventing Radiological Terrorism ing alternatives to high-risk radiological .
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or NRC, presently requires that energy plants are capable of preventing attacks carried out by five or six people, according to the report, entitled “Protecting US Nuclear Facilities from Terrorist Attack.” The report, prepared by the Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Project at the University of Texas, focuses on the terrorist attacks of . Moreover, press reports indicate that the forthcoming Nuclear posture review will make the goal of countering nuclear terrorism “equal to the traditional mission of deterring a strike by major powers or emerging nuclear adversaries.”1 Although the likelihood of a nuclear terrorist attack may be relatively low, the consequences of such an.
The tragedie of Phillis, complaining of the disloyall loue of Amyntas
An authentic narrative of a voyage performed by Captain Cook and Captain Clerke, in His Majestys ships Resolution and Discovery during the years 1776, 1777, 1778, 1779 and 1780
Contract management in construction industry
The curious little duckling
Sound reception in mammals
Calculus of variations with applications
Dramaturgy and communication
sky is falling.
Get this from a library. Threat of sabotage and terrorism to commercial nuclear powerplants: oversight hearing before the Subcommittee on General Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session hearing held in Washington, DC, March 9, Threat of sabotage and terrorism to commercial nuclear powerplants: oversight hearing before the Subcommittee on General Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session hearing held in Washington, DC, March 9, The Threat of Nuclear Terrorism FSI-Y Description “Today, the danger of some sort of nuclear catastrophe is greater than it was during the Cold War, and most people are blissfully unaware of this danger.” Dr.
William Perry wrote these words three years ago, and the danger has only increased. Nuclear terrorism refers to any person or persons who detonate a nuclear weapon in an act of terrorism (meaning illegal or immoral use of violence for a political or religious cause).
Some definitions of nuclear terrorism include the sabotage of a nuclear facility and/or the detonation of a radiological device, colloquially termed a dirty bomb, but consensus is lacking.
Nuclear terrorism could take several forms, from an attack on nuclear power plants and reactors to the detonation of a nuclear bomb in an urban area The international community urgently needs to expand its efforts to secure existing stockpiles of nuclear weapons and materials, particularly in Russia, Pakistan, and India.
Taking all this together, Buffet is right and nuclear terrorism seems indeed inevitable. In the second part of the book the author presents his approach to dealing with the threat.
His objective is "A World of Three No's" - no loose nukes, no new nascent nukes, and no new nuclear weapons states. How do we accomplish this?/5(46). Threat of sabotage and terrorism to commercial nuclear powerplants: oversight hearing before the Subcommittee on General Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session hearing held in Washington, DC, March 9, (Washington: U.S.
G.P.O. Nuclear-terrorism dangers can be divided into three categories: (1) dirty bombs, meaning conventional explosives or incendiary devices that disperse radioactive materials, (2) attacks on nuclear-weapon or nuclear-energy facilities, and (3) terrorist acquisition and use of nuclear-explosive weapons.
33 Further, the mere assertion of the capability to carry out one of these. U.S. Nuclear Programs, RDOE, by Bruce Hoffman and others, reviews recent trends in international terrorism, violent political pro test, criminal activity, sabotage, and malicious mischief that affect the security of U.S.
nuclear weapons research sites and production facili ties. iii. The vulnerability of nuclear plants to deliberate attack is of concern in the area of nuclear safety and security. Nuclear power plants, civilian research reactors, certain naval fuel facilities, uranium enrichment plants, fuel fabrication plants, and even potentially uranium mines are vulnerable to attacks which could lead to widespread radioactive contamination.
In summary, the book aims to extend the societal and political debate about the threat of nuclear terrorism. This book will be of much interest to students of nuclear proliferation, nuclear governance, terrorism studies, international organizations, and security studies in : $ Spector, Leonard S., "Clandestine Nuclear Trade and the Threat of Nuclear Terrorism", in Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: The Report and Papers of the International Task Force on Prevention of Nuclear Terrorism, ed.
by Paul Leventhal and Yonah Alexander,Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. Since the terrorist attacks of Septem Americans have had to learn to discriminate between real and imagined risks in many areas.
When it comes to domestic nuclear terrorism—a subject that Author: Gwyneth Cravens. The Greatest Threat: Preventing Nuclear Terrorism - Duration: Carnegie Corporation of New York 4, views.
What Would Happen If North Korea Launched A Nuclear Weapon - Duration: The greatest challenge to global security is the nuclear threat from rogue states, led by North Korea and Iran.
There will be no progress in Author: Moshe Kantor. The willingness of terrorists to commit suicide to achieve their evil aims makes the nuclear terrorism threat far more likely than it was before September " The IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog agency based in Vienna, helps countries around the world to prevent, intercept and respond to terrorist acts and other nuclear safety and security.
This important book makes a big contribution to public understanding and to public policy on nuclear terrorism, which might yet—despite the daunting odds—prevent it from ever happening. The Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism is the first initiative of its kind, one that takes a comprehensive approach to dealing with all elements of the challenge.
The Initiative is consistent with, and builds on, existing legal frameworks such as the Nuclear Terrorism Convention and UN Security Council Resolutions and Security is weak at many nuclear plants worldwide, says a former top U.S. nuclear regulator. By The Conversation, Contributor Ap By The Conversation, Contributor Apat 5.
Nuclear Terrorism: Threat and Response. By Jeffrey T. Richelson. The issue of how concerned American citizens and the United States government should be with the threat of nuclear terrorism has been the subject of vigorous debate in the almost eleven years since the terrorist attacks of Septem.
CRS-2 2 Federal Register, Ma (vol. 72, no. 52), Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Design Basis Threat, Final Rule, pp. 3 General NRC requirements for nuclear power plant security can be found in 10 C.F.R.
4 Federal Register, Octo (vol. 71, no. ), Nucl ear Regulatory Commission, Power Reactor Security Requirements. OFFICIAL VIEWS OF NUCLEAR TERRORISM IN THE UNITED STATES AND RUSSIA Official U.S. statements tend to refer to â Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) terrorism,â without clearly breaking down the risks of each type of threat.
As far as nuclear terrorism is concerned, official statements mainly focus on the threat of terrorist use of a. In fact, while nuclear terrorism is the most immediate and extreme danger facing our nation, it is also a preventable threat.
I’ll explain how, but first let me outline the threat. During the Cold War, efforts to maintain strategic stability and deterrence helped to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.